Reading Groundswell has been making me think about one particular event that took Social Media by storm.
Last week, the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation
announced that it would be cutting off funding for Planned Parenthood
pre-screening services.
The groundswell went crazy with this information. The conclusion everyone was coming to (which Planned Parenthood provided) was that it was a political move.
That the Komen foundation is so staunchly Pro-Life that they would stop
funding a non-abortion related service to an institution that is known to
provide abortions.
Now, wait, let’s be clear here. Komen was funding mammograms. These are breast cancer screenings. Breast cancer happens in the
breasts. Pregnancy happens in the
uterus. Komen was never funding
abortions.
So now that we now the difference between boobs and babies
we can move on.
Lots of people already knew this difference, and lots of
people were outraged. Lots of
these outraged people are the same people who donate to Susan G. Komen. They are the same people who buy pink
pens, ladles, t-shirts, ribbons, ANYTHING to support finding a cure for breast
cancer.
These people are, for all intents and purposes, Susan G.
Komen’s customers. And they spoke.
Familiar images from past times when Planned Parenthood has
been under scrutiny popped up declaring the same statement: I Stand with
Planned Parenthood.
Women and Men alike pledged to give their money to Avon walk
or directly to Planned Parenthood.
Or to any other organization that’s main agenda is actually curing
breast cancer.
Mayor Bloomberg pledged to match donations up to $250,000
towards Planned Parenthood.
Then, within 72 hours, The Susan G. Komen Foundation for the
Cure reversed their decision.
They assured the nation that Planned Parenthood and other
organizations currently receiving grants will continue to receive grants.
So what happened here?
As Groundswell explains, companies and organizations
have to listen to their consumers.
Your brand is what your customers say your brand is.
Susan G. Komen was synonymous with finding a cure. When they cut off that funding, they
clearly had no clue how the groundswell would react.
They didn’t know who they were to the Groundswell. In that decision that they made and so
rapidly reversed, their brand changed.
Upon further reading, what hasn’t been mentioned is why
Komen claims to have taken away funding.
They had new guidelines (which they assigned themselves) which stated
they would not give grants to any organization currently under investigation. Planned Parenthood is currently under
investigation.
Whether or not this was a deliberate ploy in a Pro-Life
political move is something that we may never truly know.
However, the Groundswell has spoken. And now they have basically been
re-branded as the Susan G. Komen for Life Foundation.
Komen’s image is so set now as an Anti-Choice group that
they are unlikely to ever reach the amount of donations, but more importantly,
the brand that they once had.
Chapter 5 and 6 of Groundswell explain listening and talking with the groundswell. Komen listened to the groundswell when they reversed their decision. They were listening when an executive resigned. Now they need to talk with the groundswell.
Or do they?
Chapter 6 suggests that those who are not sure where they stand with the groundswell should be hesitant. If people were happier with them then it would be no problem to jump right in. This means that they should, if they choose to join, have direct, key talking points. Engage the groundswell, but do so in a structured environment such that they can limit the negative feedback.
Chapter 5 and 6 of Groundswell explain listening and talking with the groundswell. Komen listened to the groundswell when they reversed their decision. They were listening when an executive resigned. Now they need to talk with the groundswell.
Or do they?
Chapter 6 suggests that those who are not sure where they stand with the groundswell should be hesitant. If people were happier with them then it would be no problem to jump right in. This means that they should, if they choose to join, have direct, key talking points. Engage the groundswell, but do so in a structured environment such that they can limit the negative feedback.
Much like other PR fiascos, social media may have a chance
to recover this. Komen foundation
needs to start apologizing and explaining. They need to do it fast. They need to have people outside of their organization
accepting the apologies. They need
cancer survivors who they helped to have videos on Youtube. Most of all, they need to be prepared
for all the hatred that the groundswell with throw at them. It may be a risky move. However, at this point, the internet is
so abuzz against them that putting themselves out there may just be the only
move possible.


The events around Susan G Komen's decision and reversal of its decision were so striking. The social media around these decisions was even more striking. Facebook made sure that I was so updated on these events that I couldn't have ignored them if I wanted to. The groundswell was definitely present in these events, and worked so efficiently that a decision that likely took months to make was reversed in a matter of a few days.
ReplyDeleteI couldnt believe it when I read that the Susan G Komen Foundation would no longer be funding Planned Parenthood. It was a relief to see how quickly the Groundswell caused them to reverse this decision, but at the same time, I wish that the foundation had instead of threatening to take away money from Planned Parenthood, educating the public about all of great non-abortion related services Planned Parenthood provides. Planned Parenthood only uses about 3% of their funds for abortions, which in my opinion is an important service that should be available, but they provide so many other important services that (ignorant) people ignore. I hope that something good comes out of this whole debacle, other than the CEO of the Susan G Komen Foundation losing her job.
ReplyDeleteAlthough unfortunate, I thought this was an excellent example of how the groundswell once again caused a major organization, i.e., the Susan G. Komen Foundation, to reverse course. Like a tsunami arising spontaneously in response to a disturbance at the depths of the sea, the outcry of millions of women and men to SGK's discontinuation of basic health care screening to women who cannot afford these services through private insurance was truly striking. What is most interesting to me is that the SGK Foundation probably never saw it coming and was completely blindsided. In pursuing what was most likely a private agenda to appease right-wing supporters from her failed gubernatorial campaign in Georgia, vice president for public policy, Karen Handel, totally misread the mood of the country, or her chances of getting away with changing the awarding criteria of the SGK Foundation, with disastrous results.
ReplyDelete